Expand a draft without inventing missing facts
Develop a short draft into a fuller explanation for your audience, using placeholders for facts that still need confirmation.
What to provide
- The draft, audience and desired length or format.
- Any confirmed supporting facts you want included.
Example Illustrative example
Input
Illustrative editorial example — not a recorded model test. Draft: We are updating the onboarding guide. Staff should review their section. Length/format: two short paragraphs. Audience: staff. No deadline or submission method has been supplied.
Output
We are updating the onboarding guide and need staff to review their sections. Please check whether the information is still accurate and identify any steps that are missing or unclear. For example, flag an instruction that no longer matches the current process. Send your suggested changes using [submission method] by [review deadline]. These details still need confirmation before this message is sent.
Improve the result
- List every factual addition and distinguish supplied information, illustrative examples and unresolved placeholders.
How to use this prompt
Give the model confirmed facts separately from open questions. Keep placeholders visible until a person has supplied the missing information.
What to check in the result
Extra length can invite repetition or invented details. Review every addition and replace placeholders only with confirmed information.